10 Responses

1. As I don’t work with a group on such things, I have to make do with reading them.

   I might try to bring them up with my family sometime and see what happens. I wonder if I could fit them all into one sentence?

   Posted by Fin on August 1st, 2005 at 5:02 pm

2. do they have any more open positions? (for potential immigrants? (please say yes))

   Posted by leff on August 1st, 2005 at 5:45 pm

3. fin, I think their heads might explode. beware flying craniums.

   leff – who knows what strings I could pull for the right merikan?

   Posted by Pip on August 2nd, 2005 at 8:32 am

4. You mean noone’s mentioned vlogging, yet? Or blikis?

   I’m shocked. Shocked!

   - em

   Posted by Anonymous on August 2nd, 2005 at 1:07 pm

5. haha!

   Posted by Pip on August 2nd, 2005 at 1:33 pm

6. Wish I worked somewhere where people used words that mean things. I have to listen to:

   “It’s not rocket science” (when it is)

   “vanilla layer” (in any context, really, any)

   “transitional enabler” – wtf…

   Posted by amillionlittlepieces on August 2nd, 2005 at 5:25 pm

7. hmm, I smell consultant

   Posted by Pip on August 2nd, 2005 at 7:51 pm

8. Go on, what is a “folksonomy”? Presumably some kind of redneck version of a taxonomy? Unless it’s from New Hampshire, where they don’t have tax…

   Posted by Yvonne on August 3rd, 2005 at 4:15 pm

9. It’s “a neologism for a practice of collaborative categorization using freely chosen keywords.” (ahem).

   You know, tagging; like in del.ico.us, flickr and technorati.

   Posted by Pip on August 3rd, 2005 at 6:20 pm

10. I work in a gvmt environment and have heard most of those, aside from the ones below. I’ll have to look them up and see what they mean.

    # Folksonomies
    # Emergent taxonomies
    # Ontologies

    Posted by Sara on August 13th, 2005 at 2:06 am

Leave a Comment

Name

Mail (will not be published)

Website

Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.