Comments on: Microformats and structured blogging http://philwilson.org/blog/2005/11/microformats-and-structured-blogging a geek commodity Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:27:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: Pip http://philwilson.org/blog/2005/11/microformats-and-structured-blogging/comment-page-1#comment-626 Pip Mon, 26 Jun 2006 09:36:00 +0000 http://philwilson.org/blog/2005/11/microformats-and-structured-blogging#comment-626 Yes, I think it's clear that they're not competitors, but to date SB and PubSub have seemed joined very very tightly. I think any confusion on this point is forgivable. Yes, I think it’s clear that they’re not competitors, but to date SB and PubSub have seemed joined very very tightly. I think any confusion on this point is forgivable.

]]> By: Kimbro Staken http://philwilson.org/blog/2005/11/microformats-and-structured-blogging/comment-page-1#comment-625 Kimbro Staken Sun, 25 Jun 2006 09:58:00 +0000 http://philwilson.org/blog/2005/11/microformats-and-structured-blogging#comment-625 Structured Blogging is a completely separate entity from PubSub and will not be taken down with the company. The one exception is the mailing list which is down temporarily, but will be back once it's setup on a new system.<br/><br/>Also this idea that Structured Blogging and Microformats are competitors is something that is simply <a HREF="http://www.kstaken.com/archives/46_microformats-and-structured-blogging-are-not-competitors.html" REL="nofollow">not true.</a> Structured Blogging is a completely separate entity from PubSub and will not be taken down with the company. The one exception is the mailing list which is down temporarily, but will be back once it’s setup on a new system.

Also this idea that Structured Blogging and Microformats are competitors is something that is simply not true.

]]> By: Pip http://philwilson.org/blog/2005/11/microformats-and-structured-blogging/comment-page-1#comment-624 Pip Sun, 25 Jun 2006 08:05:00 +0000 http://philwilson.org/blog/2005/11/microformats-and-structured-blogging#comment-624 They do have a mailing list which you can check out.<br/><br/>More problematic is that the structured blogging people are the same (as far as I know) as the PubSub people, and they're about to go bust. They do have a mailing list which you can check out.

More problematic is that the structured blogging people are the same (as far as I know) as the PubSub people, and they’re about to go bust.

]]> By: Peter Giger http://philwilson.org/blog/2005/11/microformats-and-structured-blogging/comment-page-1#comment-623 Peter Giger Sun, 25 Jun 2006 07:44:00 +0000 http://philwilson.org/blog/2005/11/microformats-and-structured-blogging#comment-623 Yesterday I wrote a mail to the structured blogging people, mentioning that I want to use the SB-plugin for wordpress, but I am hesitant since there is no user activity on their site - why not a forum for example? This is not 2.0 thinking and almost kind of suspicious.... Yesterday I wrote a mail to the structured blogging people, mentioning that I want to use the SB-plugin for wordpress, but I am hesitant since there is no user activity on their site – why not a forum for example? This is not 2.0 thinking and almost kind of suspicious….

]]>